- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 18:28:46 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
- Cc: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
This is a review of
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20050711/
This is a personal review, made in response to a request from the SWBPD
WG, in response to a request from ERT WG.
Substantively:
[[
F02
EARL 1.0 will provide mechanisms to relate test results with the
specific location within the subject that triggered the result where
applicable.
]]
I suggest that requirement F02 should be demoted from "will" to
"should". This is a complex requirement that would be good to meet,
however I do not believe that EARL would have failed if this requirement
cannot be met, so the lower status of "should" is appropriate.
Editorially:
I suggest that
[[
F05
EARL 1.0 may support backward compatibility of the language with
previous versions published in earlier Working Drafts.
]]
be listed as a non-requirement, or not listed at all, since the
rather particularly definition of may, seems to mean non-requirement.
[I assume further prettification comments are not interesting for this
document]
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 17:28:44 UTC