W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2005

RE: [VM] Telecon agenda - Tue Oct 15 at 1400 UTC (1500 Amsterdam)

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:01:49 +0100
To: "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Cc: "SW Best Practices" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GOEIKOOAMJONEFCANOKCIEALHEAA.bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>


Last minute obligations, regrets.

In any case, I would have had no significant input to bring on the technical points of the
agenda - quite off my expertise domain, I'm afraid :((

Bernard

----------------------------------
Bernard Vatant
Mondeca Knowledge Engineering
bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
(+33) 0871 488 459

http://www.mondeca.com
http://universimmedia.blogspot.com
----------------------------------

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]De la part de Libby Miller
> Envoyé : mardi 15 novembre 2005 12:58
> Ŕ : Thomas Baker
> Cc : SW Best Practices
> Objet : Re: [VM] Telecon agenda - Tue Oct 15 at 1400 UTC (1500
> Amsterdam)
>
>
>
>
> I can make it for the first 30 minutes only, sorry (dawg clash).
>
> Libby
>
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Thomas Baker wrote:
>
> >
> > Vocabulary Management telecon, Tue, Nov 15, 1400 UTC (1500 Berlin)
> >
> > Zakim: +1.617.761.6200
> > Conference code 8683# ('VMTF')
> > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/vmtf
> > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1678
> >
> >
> > AGENDA
> >
> > This telecon will discuss the following best-practice goal:
> >
> >   A URI for an RDF Property or Class should be dereferencable and
> >   should provide both RDF (i.e. content type application/rdf+xml) and
> >   [X]HTML representations (e.g. content type text/html or
> >   application/xhtml+xml).  The client should be able to choose the
> >   representation by using content negotiation.
> >
> > As outlined in [1], the call will walk through the following
> > eight items with the goal of answering the questions associated
> > with each:
> >
> > ITEM 1: Minimum Requirements
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Minimum
> >
> >     Are the 'minimum requirements' ...
> >
> >      (a) Correct?
> >      (b) Complete?
> >
> > ITEM 2: Good Practice Requirements
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Good-Pract
> >
> >     Are the 'good-practice requirements' ...
> >
> >      (a) Correct?
> >      (b) Complete?
> >
> > ITEM 3: Hash Static Configuration, Minimal
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example1
> >
> >      (a) Does 'example 1' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
> >      (b) Is 'example 1' configuration optimal?
> >      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 1' configuration?
> >
> > ITEM 4: Hash Static Configuration, Good Practice
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example2
> >
> >      (a) Does 'example 2' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
> >      (b) Is 'example 2' configuration optimal?
> >      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 2' configuration?
> >
> >     (This configuration is proposed for SKOS Core)
> >
> > ITEM 5: Slash Static Configuration, Minimal
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example3
> >
> >      (a) Does 'example 3' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
> >      (b) Is 'example 3' configuration optimal?
> >      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 3' configuration?
> >
> > ITEM 6: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Single Document)
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example4
> >
> >      (a) Does 'example 4' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
> >      (b) Is 'example 4' configuration optimal?
> >      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 4' configuration?
> >
> >     (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)
> >
> > ITEM 7: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Multiple Documents)
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example5
> >
> >      (a) Does 'example 5' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
> >      (b) Is 'example 5' configuration optimal?
> >      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 5' configuration?
> >
> >     (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)
> >
> > ITEM 8: Slash Dynamic Configuration, Best Practice
> >
> >     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example6
> >
> >      (a) Is this a good idea?
> >      (b) Any thoughts on easiest way to make this happen?
> >
> >
> > REFERENCES
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0004.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Thomas Baker                      baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
> > SUB - Goettingen State                            +49-551-39-3883
> > and University Library                           +49-30-8109-9027
> > Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 14:01:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:19 GMT