W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2005

[VM] Telecon agenda - Tue Oct 15 at 1400 UTC (1500 Amsterdam)

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:41:01 +0100
To: SW Best Practices <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20051115094101.GA2032@Octavius>

Vocabulary Management telecon, Tue, Nov 15, 1400 UTC (1500 Berlin)

Zakim: +1.617.761.6200
Conference code 8683# ('VMTF')
irc://irc.w3.org:6665/vmtf
http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1678


AGENDA

This telecon will discuss the following best-practice goal:

  A URI for an RDF Property or Class should be dereferencable and
  should provide both RDF (i.e. content type application/rdf+xml) and
  [X]HTML representations (e.g. content type text/html or
  application/xhtml+xml).  The client should be able to choose the
  representation by using content negotiation.

As outlined in [1], the call will walk through the following
eight items with the goal of answering the questions associated
with each:

ITEM 1: Minimum Requirements

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Minimum

    Are the 'minimum requirements' ...

     (a) Correct?
     (b) Complete?

ITEM 2: Good Practice Requirements

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Good-Pract

    Are the 'good-practice requirements' ...

     (a) Correct?
     (b) Complete?

ITEM 3: Hash Static Configuration, Minimal

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example1

     (a) Does 'example 1' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
     (b) Is 'example 1' configuration optimal?
     (c) Any potential problems with 'example 1' configuration?

ITEM 4: Hash Static Configuration, Good Practice

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example2

     (a) Does 'example 2' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
     (b) Is 'example 2' configuration optimal?
     (c) Any potential problems with 'example 2' configuration?

    (This configuration is proposed for SKOS Core)

ITEM 5: Slash Static Configuration, Minimal

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example3

     (a) Does 'example 3' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
     (b) Is 'example 3' configuration optimal?
     (c) Any potential problems with 'example 3' configuration?

ITEM 6: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Single Document)

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example4

     (a) Does 'example 4' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
     (b) Is 'example 4' configuration optimal?
     (c) Any potential problems with 'example 4' configuration?

    (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)

ITEM 7: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Multiple Documents)

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example5

     (a) Does 'example 5' configuration satisfy 'good-practice requirements'?
     (b) Is 'example 5' configuration optimal?
     (c) Any potential problems with 'example 5' configuration?

    (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)

ITEM 8: Slash Dynamic Configuration, Best Practice

    See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example6

     (a) Is this a good idea?
     (b) Any thoughts on easiest way to make this happen?


REFERENCES

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0004.html


-- 
Dr. Thomas Baker                      baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
SUB - Goettingen State                            +49-551-39-3883
and University Library                           +49-30-8109-9027
Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 09:40:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:19 GMT