[XSCH/ALL] straw poll options

Dear all,

I was not happy about the third option in Saterday's straw poll.
I felt I was forced to vote on "leave it to the application", while I was
under the impression that Jeff's proposal was something along the lines of:

"no owl entailment, but provide a well-defined a way that applications 
can use to 'map' 1.3 floats on 1.3 doubles etc".

In my opinion, this approach solves the formal owl problems, the 
non-monotonic problem and
the interoperability problems.

Jacco

Received on Saturday, 5 November 2005 18:26:26 UTC