Dear all, I was not happy about the third option in Saterday's straw poll. I felt I was forced to vote on "leave it to the application", while I was under the impression that Jeff's proposal was something along the lines of: "no owl entailment, but provide a well-defined a way that applications can use to 'map' 1.3 floats on 1.3 doubles etc". In my opinion, this approach solves the formal owl problems, the non-monotonic problem and the interoperability problems. JaccoReceived on Saturday, 5 November 2005 18:26:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:19 GMT