Re: [OEP] minutes of 5/26 telecon - Naming the 3rd Use Case

Ok, updated in the Editor's draft -- I like this one too (thanks Mike  
and Chris!)

Natasha


On May 26, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Uschold, Michael F wrote:

>
> Yes, I like that suggestion.
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Welty [mailto:welty@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:32 PM
> To: Natasha Noy
> Cc: Uschold, Michael F; public-swbp-wg@w3.org; rector@cs.man.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [OEP] minutes of 5/26 telecon - Naming the 3rd Use Case
>
>
>
>>> My suggestion for the last one:
>>> "Multiple aspects of a single event or situation, with no
>>> distinguished
>>> participant."
>>>
>>
>> This is fine, except I would replace "event or situation" with
>> "relation" or something else that is sufficiently general -- the
>> between example to me is neither an event or a situation (at least
>> for people with little background in KR).
>>
>
>
> Slightly shorter: "N-ary relation with no distinguished participant"
>
> -Chris
>
> Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
> IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY   
> 10532     USA
>
>
> Voice: +1 914.784.7055,  IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
> Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web:
> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
>
>
>
>