W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > May 2005

Re: [All] Policy on Footnotes

From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:28:18 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050526132200.0353ac28@127.0.0.1>
To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

At 03:42 PM 5/25/2005 -0700, Uschold, Michael F wrote:
>This is a matter of personal style preference and there is a tradeoff. 

yep, and I'm generally willing to accept the preference of
whomever steps forward to be the editor(s) of any given document.

>For readers that DO like to read notes, it is disruptive to have to flip
>several pages forward to find the notes and then back to the text (I'm
>in this group).

And it's frustrating that HTML printing support doesn't make it
easy to have footnotes on the page where they are referenced.
(As an inveterate reader of notes myself, I find that my mental
flow is interrupted much less if I can glance at the bottom of
the page and back rather than flipping to endnotes.)

>2. Does the W3C ... have a position on this?

Nothing on this topic is documented in W3C Manual of Style [1].

   [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/

>3. If not, should we?

I think we have more important debates with which to occupy our time ;)
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 17:29:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:17 GMT