- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 02:30:34 +0200
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, "'HTML WG'" <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
* Mark Birbeck wrote: >You said that RDF/A was dropped, and I replied that it wasn't. You then said >that there had been insufficient explanation of the motivations for RDF/A, >so I gave you some. You now say that RDF/A doesn't do the job...I hope >you'll forgive me if I don't chase your moving goalposts any more on this -- >especially since you warned me in your first email that you are unlikely to >be convinced ;) Sorry Mark but I said in response to Dan Brickley's comments on RDF/A in SVG that the SVG Working Group rejected that idea and similar concerns have been expressed on RDF/A in XHTML, such that I do not see much point in keeping RDF/A on the agenda. I've been then been asked whether it is my expectation that the HTML Working Group might "drop" RDF/A to which I responded that that would not surprise me. You then said that you do not understand how I could arrive at that point and I've explained that (yet again). That RDF/A does not seem to "do the job" I said long ago, there is nothing new here. I did not say "RDF/A was dropped" at any point. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:29:50 UTC