- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:29:33 -0400
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
At 12:59 PM 5/10/2005 -0400, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >There is a lot happening this fall and it would be helpful >to have the plans for the next ftf settled. I would indeed. It might help if people were to post known conflicts. The comments field of the location poll [1] is a great place to record your known conflicts. > I don't remember >this being mentioned at the last telecon. [[ Has everyone here submitted their data on straw poll on next f2f location? ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2005/05/05-swbp-minutes#item01 As of today there have been 19 respondents and 33 non-respondents to that poll. I have extended the questionnaire [1] by another month in hopes that some of the remaining 33 might respond. Of the 19 who have responded there is a very clear preponderance of support for Galway. At the Boston face-to-face [2], the Galway option was proposed so as to be concurrent with ISWC [3] (6-10 November). I read "concurrent with" as "immediately preceding or following", not "in parallel with". I suppose the poll could be augmented with an additional question "before?" (3-4 or 4-5 Nov) or "after?" (11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16 Nov). [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35495/ftf2005/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/03-swbp-minutes#item10 [3] http://iswc2005.semanticweb.org/ -Ralph
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 17:29:56 UTC