- From: Jeff Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0000
- To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear Pat, Thanks very much for your comments. [...] >>>Appendix A >>> >>>Might be interesting to relate the RDF/OWL definitions to the XML >>>definition given at the start. XML doesnt mention value spaces at >>>all, >> >>Yes it does, > > Can you point me to where? I read all of the (old) XSD part 2 > carefully looking for it. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#value-space >>it doesn't define the l2v mapping as such. >> >>>and its use of 'facets' strongly suggests that the XML view simply >>>allows questions of identity to be highly contextual, in contrast >>>to the model-theoretic approach we used. Might be worth expanding >>>on this difference, which is responsible IMO for many of the >>>complexities and ambiguities you discuss. In Appendix B, we use unary datatype expressions to represent user-defined XML Schema dataytpes constructed by facets; cf. Example C: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw/#example_C. Jeff -- Dr. Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester >>No. Feels too difficult. > > OK. Maybe we should write a paper about it instead :-) > > Pat > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > >
Received on Friday, 4 March 2005 13:44:39 UTC