Re: [XSCH, ALL] some detailed comments from datatype note review

Minor Correction:

>> - There is still a note to the editor in this section, "@@@ todo
>>   datetime stuff - I think they are all incomparible should check."
>>
> 
> I've just done that, there is an editorial issue with the definition of 
> eq on these values, but the basic rule is that this is the 
> primitive-equality that you mentioned above.

There isn't an editorial issue, my eyes glanced over the word "etc." in 
a table in XPath 2.0 WD, which fixes my supposed issue.

I need to replace the @@@ todo with some text, but it won't be interesting.

Jeremy