Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review

Jeremy,

Many thanks for your kind offer. Our aim is indeed to seek direction for
this, and similar notes, at the F2F, but  I am, however, unsure if the
outcome of group note review is supposed to be as clinical as a 'yes' or
'no' answer. I look to Guus and Ralph for direction here.

Regards

Phil Tetlow
Senior Consultant
IBM Business Consulting Services
Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328


                                                                           
             Jeremy Carroll                                                
             <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.                                             
             com>                                                       To 
                                       Phil Tetlow/UK/IBM@IBMGB            
             22/02/2005 05:52                                           cc 
                                       SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>       
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft  - For   
                                       Group Review                        
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Phil Tetlow wrote:
>
>
>
> Please find attached the latest version of the SETF's draft note on
> Ontology Driven Architectures and the Application of the Semantic Web in
> Software Engineering. Further comment would indeed be appreciated.
>
> Regards

I will review by the F2F. Hopefully, I'll manage to e-mail comments, but
it might only be a verbal top-level review summary at meeting, with
detailed e-mail to follow.

I will be happy to have such an action recorded against me at this
week's telecon (for which I have already offered regrets). (I am
unlikely to see the minutes until after I have completed the review)

If I understand correctly, the editors hope that the WG may approve
publication at the F2F, so the top-level review summary is basically a
yes or a no.

Jeremy

Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 11:28:15 UTC