W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > February 2005

[WNET] WOrdnet Ontology

From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:26:33 -0800
Message-ID: <823043AB1B52784D97754D186877B6CF05F5D11C@xch-nw-12.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

I was googled on: [wordnet "owl lite"] and got to the Wordnet TaskForce
page:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html 

My specific goal was to find out if wordnet171.owl was in Owl Lite or
-DL or -Full.

There already is at least one, and possible more WN ontologies in OWL
already,e.g. the one at the knOWLer site.

What is the rationale for the TF to produce another WN ontology in OWL.
What are the issues with the existing ones?

Thanks,
Mike
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:27:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:14 GMT