Re: [WN] technical questions

Hi Jacco,

You're right, thanks for spotting this. Will get these bug out in the 
next version. A collegue of mine (Willem Verhage) also found a bug. 
Some words contain slashes and end up in the fragment of the URI, 
which of course it should not. I will replace slashes with an 
underscore in the next version.

Mark.

Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> - I think that "antonym" the rdf:type wn:Word and "antonym" the rdf:type 
> owl:ObjectProperty currently have the same URI (wn:antonym).  Am I 
> missing something? Or do you need a separate namespace for the schema 
> and the instance data?
> 
> - And in wordnet-antonym.rdf:
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="&wn;natural_object-n-1">
>  <wn:antonym rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
>  <wn:antonymOf rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> Isn't antonym supposed to be the inverse of antonymOf?  Now they are 
> identical.
> 
> Jacco
> 

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark