RE: [WN] Fwd: WordNet Namespace

Hi Mark,
 
> > Two alternatives may be:
> >
> > 1. All statements with this resource as subject, predicate or object.
> > 2. The concise bounded description of the resource [1]
> 
> These are options only for the slash-case, right?
> 

Yes. I don't know if this came up before in the discussion (sorry if I
repeat something), but the problem with hash URIs is that the fragment
identifier (the part after the hash) is not passed on to the server. 

So something like

http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf#entity

will be seen by the Princeton server as

http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf

So the only thing the server can do is to return the entire WordNet. Patrick
Stickler's workaround is to pass on the full URI as an HTTP header [1]. But
again, I couldn't say this is best practice.

Cheers,
Peter

[1] http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html