- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:57:29 +0100
- To: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, jjc@hpl.hp.com, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr
Aldo Gangemi wrote: > My proposal is to use http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf I think that would be fine. In my opinion (Dave Booth may disagree) the 'rdf' in the namespace also makes the use of hash URIs (as used now in the conversion) OK. But for me, the most important thing is that the namespace is _stable_. Additional comment to the document [1]: In my previous review, I had mainly looked at the document itself. I just had a brief look at the rdf files themselves and I think the sheer size is worthwhile discussing. The various files add now up to over 150MB uncompressed RDF/XML, when loaded in SWI-Prolog it gives a memory footprint of over 300MB. I think it is usefull to - at least mention the footprint so users are warned - compare the footprint to the other conversions, explain the difference and argue what the benefits are - think about the possibillity for a lean and mean version. If most users end up ingnoring this version because other versions are so much smaller, this would be in strong conflict with the second "it should be convenient to work with" requirement mentioned in [1]. Jacco [1] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark/wn/wn-conversion.html
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 10:05:17 UTC