W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [VM] [Fwd: http-range resolution - should we ask purl.org to make 303 redirects possible? (DC, RSS1, ...)]

From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:43:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4301ED76.4030303@internetalchemy.org>
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, SWBPD WG <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

I'm not sure I fully understand the issue.

I would expect a PURL 302 redirecting to a location which then 303 
redirects to another document to be an acceptable solution.

I use this for the relationship RDF schema. I have a property:

http://purl.org/vocab/relationship/childOf

which 302 redirects to

http://vocab.org/relationship/childOf

which 303 redirects to

http://vocab.org/relationship/

which provides HTML and RDF documentation for the property.

Ian
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2005 13:43:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:17 GMT