Re: [VM] [Fwd: http-range resolution - should we ask purl.org to make 303 redirects possible? (DC, RSS1, ...)]

I'm not sure I fully understand the issue.

I would expect a PURL 302 redirecting to a location which then 303 
redirects to another document to be an acceptable solution.

I use this for the relationship RDF schema. I have a property:

http://purl.org/vocab/relationship/childOf

which 302 redirects to

http://vocab.org/relationship/childOf

which 303 redirects to

http://vocab.org/relationship/

which provides HTML and RDF documentation for the property.

Ian