W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > August 2005

RE: [OEP] Using OWL abstract syntax in notes

From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:47:00 -0700
Message-ID: <4301AFA5A72736428DA388B73676A381B4C793@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Christopher Welty" <welty@us.ibm.com>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

Great idea.

M.

============================================
Mike Uschold
Tel: 425 865-3605              Fax: 425 865-2965
============================================



>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Christopher Welty [mailto:welty@us.ibm.com] 
>  Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:53 PM
>  To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
>  Subject: [OEP] Using OWL abstract syntax in notes
>  
>  
>  
>  I am (finally) working on incorporating the review comments 
>  in the next 
>  version of the simple parts note, and am finding this 
>  ridiculous triple 
>  notation a real obstacle for understanding and writing the 
>  OWL code.  I'm 
>  not sure why everyone has been using it in these notes - was 
>  it just a 
>  personal preference? 
>  
>  The OWL abstract syntax was specifically designed to be easy 
>  to read/type 
>  for humans - I am going to switch the examples to that, at 
>  least for this 
>  note.
>  
>  -Chris
>  
>  Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
>  IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY  10532
>  Voice: +1 914.784.7055,  IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
>  Email: welty@watson.ibm.com
>  Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
>  
>  
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2005 16:49:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:17 GMT