Re: [OEP] Using OWL abstract syntax in notes

Chris

I* agree.  Sorry to have been elusive.  Bandwidth bottleneck.
I agree.  The abstract syntax, possibly glossed with something more  
readable.

Alan

On 11 Aug 2005, at 03:53, Christopher Welty wrote:

>
> I am (finally) working on incorporating the review comments in the  
> next
> version of the simple parts note, and am finding this ridiculous  
> triple
> notation a real obstacle for understanding and writing the OWL  
> code.  I'm
> not sure why everyone has been using it in these notes - was it just a
> personal preference?
>
> The OWL abstract syntax was specifically designed to be easy to  
> read/type
> for humans - I am going to switch the examples to that, at least  
> for this
> note.
>
> -Chris
>
> Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
> IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY  10532
> Voice: +1 914.784.7055,  IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
> Email: welty@watson.ibm.com
> Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
>
>

-----------------------
Alan Rector
Professor of Medical Informatics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Manchester M13 9PL, UK
TEL +44 (0) 161 275 6188/6149
FAX +44 (0) 161 275 6204
www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig
www.clinical-esciences.org
www.co-ode.org

Received on Thursday, 11 August 2005 08:36:29 UTC