Re: [OEP] The n-ary relations draft is ready for outside review from Natasha Noy on 2005-08-02 (public-swbp-wg@w3.org from August 2005)

From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:22:23 -0700
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
Cc: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A9308547-60DA-4DA1-A321-2687BB80919D@SMI.Stanford.EDU>

Ralph,

Thank you very much for your comments! We'll integrate them and reply  
with questions, etc. once we get the second review from Guus -- it's  
just easier to do this in one go.

> I think it might be useful to mention RDF reification much earlier;
> perhaps with a brief sentence at the end of General Issues something
> like "These patterns avoid using RDF reification for reasons
> discussed in the final section."

Chris, I think this is a reasonable compromise. It puts the pointer  
in for those who do get confused about this, without obscuring the  
content and putting hard issues first for more naive users. What do  
you think?

Natasha
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2005 19:22:26 UTC