W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review

From: Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:12:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4254DD72.B5B1E78E@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Natasha Noy <noy@smi.stanford.edu>
CC: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org

natasha noy wrote...
> [[
> If all are defined in this way we get a hierarchy from the classifier:
> CarPart
>   Motor
>     MotorPart
>         Headlight
>             HeadlightPart
>                   Headlight_bulb
>   ...

I'll respond ot the other comments  in more detail later.
But thanks for this one which we can eliminate as an editing glitch.

This has somehow gone wrong in formatting. It hould be

- Motor
- MotorPart
- - Crankshaft
- - CrankshaftPart
- Headlight
- HeadlightPart
- - HeadlightBult

The point should be that you get the explosion but with two items at each level, one for the thing
and one for its parts.
At some point, either I or one of those helping has been overenthusiastic during proof reading in
"improving" the formatting.  I'll also add a gloss to make the point clearer.

I've started putting in dashes in such cases and will probably continue to.



Alan L Rector
Professor of Medical Informatics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Manchester M13 9PL, UK
TEL: +44-161-275-6188/6149/7183
FAX: +44-161-275-6236/6204
Room: 2.88a, Kilburn Building
email: rector@cs.man.ac.uk
web: www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 09:03:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:42 UTC