W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > October 2004

Re: re: [VM] [ALL] TR: Extended Metadata Registry (XMDR) Project

From: <dwood@tucanatech.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:28:49 +0000
To: "public-swbp-wg@w3.org" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041030182849.90B1232C94@ns1.tucanatech.com>

Hi all,

I have been working recently with one of the members of the XMDR project
on related matters.  I will see if any of them are interested in WG
participation.

What would the VM task force like to do with them if they are willing?

On 10/29/2004, "ewallace@cme.nist.gov" <ewallace@cme.nist.gov> wrote:

>
>
>Bernard Vatant wrote:
>>Dear all
>>
>>Find below the beginning of a message I received today from Bruce
>>E. Bargmeyer (LBNL, Chair of ISO SC32) about the XMDR project. See in
>>particular http://hpcrd.lbl.gov/SDM/XMDR/overview.html
>>
>>I think this is of interest for our WG, and that we should welcome
>>Bruce and other folks from XMDR to join our efforts.
>
>Coincidentally, I will be attending sessions concerning XMDR and the
>related Asian effort (ISO 19763 Framework for metamodel
>interoperability mentioned at the link above) at next month's SC32/WG2
>meeting in Washington.  My role will be to represent the OMG ODM
>activity, so any official relation to SWBPD would be, at best,
>indirect.
>
>Even so, perhaps I could provide observations on the relationship of
>these groups following the meeting.  What relationship did you
>envision between SWBPD and the XMDR activity?
>
>-Evan
>
Received on Saturday, 30 October 2004 18:21:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:13 GMT