RE: Response to DAWG on Best Practice for Data Access

Granted, I will also make sure it happens in the future with all
discussions I have related to the WG. I think we all agreed this was a
marginal case, but reasonable place to re-iterate the principle.

G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll
> Sent: 26 October 2004 05:30
> To: Phil Tetlow
> Cc: best-practice
> Subject: Re: Response to DAWG on Best Practice for Data Access
> 
> 
> Phil Tetlow wrote:
> > Point taken. I was unsure if listing the full thread would added
value
> for
> > the DAWG guys.
> 
> 
> I think that value is there by having the thread public, but a summary
> allows the DAWG guys to easily get to the meat, and allows a
meaningful
> process of (dis)agreement.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
>