- From: Gary Ng <Gary.Ng@networkinference.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:25:21 -0700
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Phil Tetlow" <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: "best-practice" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Granted, I will also make sure it happens in the future with all discussions I have related to the WG. I think we all agreed this was a marginal case, but reasonable place to re-iterate the principle. G > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll > Sent: 26 October 2004 05:30 > To: Phil Tetlow > Cc: best-practice > Subject: Re: Response to DAWG on Best Practice for Data Access > > > Phil Tetlow wrote: > > Point taken. I was unsure if listing the full thread would added value > for > > the DAWG guys. > > > I think that value is there by having the thread public, but a summary > allows the DAWG guys to easily get to the meat, and allows a meaningful > process of (dis)agreement. > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:28:57 UTC