danbri DAWG input Re: [ALL] agenda Nov 18 telecon

>    ACTION: danbri circulate links for his existing feedback/review to dawg
Please mark completed. 

Here is a list of my (ok fairly adhoc) messages to the DAWG comments list:

13Oct http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Oct/0002.html
	a syntax for "RDF idiom conversion rules"?

	- explores use of SPARQL's SESAME-derrived 'CONSTRUCT' mechanism
	to express simple rules being debated in Dublin Core community.


28Sep http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Sep/0006.html
	URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case

	- revisiting the 'about each prefix' and PICS labelling space.
	My current funded work at W3C/ERCIM is in this area, I expect 
	to come back to this topic in more detail over next 6 months.


9Sep http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Sep/0003.html
	use case fodder for xml output - mozilla templates (svg generator)

	- trying to hook DAWG up with the only widely deployed RDF 
	query system, Mozilla's XUL, and it's templating mechanism
	which can generate arbitrary XML (eg. SVG) not just triples.

3Sep http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Sep/0000.html
	namespace versioning (Dublin Core) use case for DAWG?

	- motivating DAWG's optionals mechanism with implementor 
	feedback on the hassles we all had with DC being deployed 
	in two v similar namespaces. Also relates to our [VM] TF.


I think that's it. Purpose for sending this was mainly informational if 
I recall.
If someone was collecting evidence that DAWG's work has been looked 
at by SWBPD WG members, this might be useful. 


>    ACTION: Brian and DanBri need to talk about what need to do for
>      Wordnet document to be good enough

Please continue this. I hope to spend some time on Wordnet next week,
and if possibly sync with Brian.

I have other ACTIONs unrecorded here, but which were in my notes 
from the Wordnet f2f breakout, which I'll revisit next week.

cheers,

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 23:41:30 UTC