W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: [PORT] Scoping for Proposed Working Drafts

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:10:12 -0500 (EST)
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "'public-swbp-wg@w3.org'" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0411091202510.29797@homer.w3.org>

Looks like a good plan to me. I agree that it is important to have stuff that
covers the entire spec (in part this is a good test of it. If you find
documentation that seems like it's descriing something odd, it quite possily

Some very rough thoughts aout the Wiki Page:

Break out the RDF into seperate pieces that you can discuss one at a time -
see the approach in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/talks/200311-earl/all which
boils down to about a single page for for enough to make stuff work (the rest
is advanced thoughts and optimisations).

So each entry for the term (term, narrower terms, etc) would have a few lines
describing how to encode that piece of information.

Simplify the example metadata for the thesaurus itself...



On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:

>Hi all,
>At the SWBPD-WG face-to-face meeting last week, we discussed whether to
>initially publish a document that is a very quick and easy guide to
>publishing fairly standard thesauri in RDF.  Such a document should be of ~3
>page length, and use a concrete example of a thesaurus, already published in
>I've put together a draft of such a document on the SkosDev wiki, see:
>[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/PublishingThesauriPrimerToc
>I would also like to suggest that we *do* aim to publish a 'guide' document
>for SKOS Core, something like what is at [3], to describe and illustrate the
>use of *all* of the features of SKOS Core, and also to discuss some
>additional issues.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 17:10:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:40 UTC