- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 05:30:39 -0400
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
* McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com> [2004-05-17 09:31+0100] > > > > > > The paper is really about indicating the subject of > > resources using OWL ontologies. > > I would prefer to see RDFS included within the scope of the paper. OWL is built upon RDFS, so it is already in there. The issue is more terminological difference I think: RDF people say 'vocabulary' and OWL people say 'ontology'. Perhaps if we wrote 'RDF/OWL' more often, the commonality might be made more widely appreciated? Dan
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 05:31:28 UTC