W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > May 2004

Re: Close to final draft of "classes as values" note

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 05:30:39 -0400
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20040517093036.GD6758@homer.w3.org>

* McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com> [2004-05-17 09:31+0100]
> > 
> > The paper is really about indicating the subject of  
> > resources using OWL ontologies.
> I would prefer to see RDFS included within the scope of the paper.

OWL is built upon RDFS, so it is already in there. The issue is more 
terminological difference I think: RDF people say 'vocabulary' and 
OWL people say 'ontology'. Perhaps if we wrote 'RDF/OWL' more often, 
the commonality might be made more widely appreciated?

Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 05:31:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:38 UTC