W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > May 2004

RE: [WRLD ?] : do we have to consider such problems ?

From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 10:02:16 +0100
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E808031A9045@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP <marco.nanni@francetelecom.com>
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org

 


[...]
> 	
> 
> 	The question  :
> 	
> 
> 	        "For my project I need some semantic features 
> and to reason on ontologies
> 	        so i have taken into consideration the following tools :
> 	
> 
> 		        FaCT, RACER, jena, JTP, Pellet, Jess, 
> Clips, Jadex, tuprolog, Algernon.
> 		        Could you give me some advices ?"
> 		
> 
> 		Oups!! It's really a strange tools salad, isn't it ?
> 		
> 
> 		So, do you think that what we can say could be :
> 
> 
> I think the only appropriate answer to a question like this 
> is to ask for more information about what the questioner is 
> trying to do. Until you know more, its impossible to give 
> rational advice. Maybe they would be best off without using 
> Sweb technology at all.

Is this a question we want to take on at all?  If its advice based on
experience of using the tools that is requested, then maybe the interest
group is the place to ask.

Brian
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 05:03:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:38 UTC