- From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 10:18:43 -0700
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Alistair, > This is an interesting question, I am not sure where I come down on > this. Yes, I don't have an answer either > An argument for using SKOS within a note like this is that it is > supported > by some fairly clear and well-presented documentation on how it is > supposed > to be used, which can be linked to. exactly, and that's one argument. On the other hand, if we are trying to illustrate a point, such as when and how to use classes as property values, it may be good to limit the content of the example to things that are absolutely necessary to understanding the point and not have the reader have to wander elsewhere to look for things that don't make the example any clearer. Or do they? So, in this particular case, would referring to the SKOS vocabulary make an example more clear than using the local parentSubject property? What do you think? I really don't have an answer... Natasha PS. I do agree with Bernard though that referring to specific (or at least realistic book titles) is better than having individuals named MyLionBook.
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 13:18:46 UTC