W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > June 2004

review Working Drafts linked from WG home page

From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:26:39 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040625092101.029f7b38@127.0.0.1>
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org

I have created the following URIs for the three proposed
OEP Working Drafts.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Lists-of-values

These are now listed in the Documents section of the WG
home page: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#FreqLinks1

These are intended to be the names of the "latest version" of 
the editor's drafts.  At this moment they are redirects to the following
static versions:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations-20040623/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues-20040623/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Lists-of-values-20040625/

I recommend that reviewers and comments refer to these versioned
URIs when it is important to be explicit about the document version
and use the "latest version" URIs when talking generically about the
document.

These static versions were copied respectively from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0030/n-aryRelations-v2.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0031/ClassesAsValues-v6.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0127.html

Alan, your lists-ofvalues-v5.html refers to a non-existent
style/guideline.css (not in your zip archive).  I have not
changed this. I did rename your two .rdf-xml files to .rdf
as this is the naming convention our site uses for recognizing
content intended to be served as application/rdf+xml

-Ralph
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 09:26:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:39 UTC