>> :Diagnosis_Relation >> a owl:Class ; >> rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Statement >> rdfs:subClassOf >> [ a owl:Restriction ; >> owl:allValuesFrom :Probability_values ; >> owl:onProperty :diagnosis_probability >> ] . >> >> And then: >> >> :Christine >> a :Person ; >> :has_diagnosis :Breast_Tumor . >> >> :Diagnosis_Relation_1 >> a :Diagnosis_Relation ; >> rdf:subject :Christine ; >> rdf:predicate :has_diagnosis ; >> rdf:object :Breast_Tumor ; >> :diagnosis_probability :HIGH . > This is actually equivalent to the second pattern in the note, although > without the specific use of rdf;Statement. Or am I missing something? You are right, it could be considered as a special case of the second pattern, though it makes more sense in the context of the first example. I wonder if this may be worth pointing out anyway?Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 04:29:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:12 GMT