W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > July 2004

[WNET] TF minutes for 8th July

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:30:46 +0100
Message-ID: <40FD1076.1060806@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>


Hi here are the WNET TF minutes for the second half of the telecon on 
8th July. A bit rough ...

IRC
http://www.w3.org/2004/07/08-swbp-irc
(commencing 15:09:56)

Present:
     Ralph, Guus, Alistair, DanBri,
     Aldo, jeremy, brian, PatH

Actions:
     ACTION Jeremy: literal format / 118N issues
     ACTION Guus: IDs for word senses pros and cons
     ACTION Aldo on Synset URIs in relation to versioning


We worked through some of the issues in
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/wordnet_2.rdf


1) How to ensure that an RDFS processor can process this correctly and
   also be sure a DL processor can also process it correctly.

Postponed

2) Use of XML literal rather than xsd:String.  Where might we need to
    allow XML markup?  e.g. glossary entry, lexical form?

I18N have been asked, but no response:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2004Jul/0001

     Options: XMLLiteral, plain literal, or xsd:string

10) IDs for word senses?

Discussion about whether word senses needed URIs or not.
Summary: URIs are useful but not a drop-dead requirement

11) concatenated names for synsets?
Possible synset URIs like
  http://example.com/..../syn_234242_Some_Friendly_Text_here
where _Some_Friendly_Text is a concatenation of word senses

12) synset URIs and versioning?

Synset IDs are not preserved across versions.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 08:31:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:12 GMT