Re: [ALL] review of n-ary relations

>> Further examples of URIs I don't like are in the example files where 
>> URIs starting http://protege.stanford.edu/ could be seen as endorsing 
>> protege rather than other tools. I think a w3.org URI would be more 
>> appropriate, in WG space, for these WG examples.
>
> The example files should actually work, so it is more important
> here that the URIs not return 404.

I agree. See my question in reply to Jeremy.

>> RDF reification: I think the sentence referring the interested reader 
>> to  the discussion of reification in RDF could be deleted.
>
> I disagree.  The topics are related.  A future version of the document
> might want to say a bit more about the differences.

I am hoping that someone who knows more about reification in RDF than I 
do could write up that part :)

> Typos:

All fixed -- thanks a lot for the careful read!

Natasha