W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [ALL] review of n-ary relations

From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:49:04 -0700
Message-Id: <D2568D3B-D46E-11D8-BB34-000A958B5C28@smi.stanford.edu>
Cc: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>

>> Further examples of URIs I don't like are in the example files where 
>> URIs starting http://protege.stanford.edu/ could be seen as endorsing 
>> protege rather than other tools. I think a w3.org URI would be more 
>> appropriate, in WG space, for these WG examples.
> The example files should actually work, so it is more important
> here that the URIs not return 404.

I agree. See my question in reply to Jeremy.

>> RDF reification: I think the sentence referring the interested reader 
>> to  the discussion of reification in RDF could be deleted.
> I disagree.  The topics are related.  A future version of the document
> might want to say a bit more about the differences.

I am hoping that someone who knows more about reification in RDF than I 
do could write up that part :)

> Typos:

All fixed -- thanks a lot for the careful read!

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 07:48:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:39 UTC