RE: [WNET] Draft summary of WNET proposal document

Aldo,

I don't understand your intention with this document.  It reads like a
description of what the TF is going to do and how it is going to go about
it.  I wasn't envisaging we would publish a note of that sort.  I thought
we'd publish a note describing Princeton Wordnet expressed on Owl.  I did a
very bare first cut at that in [1] as a placeholder for further work.

Is it your intention that this new document replaces that one?  Or is it a
different document with a different purpose.  I looked up the task force
description [2] but that isn't specific about what notes you are planning to
produce.

I'm confused.  Putting my name down as co-editor may be a bit premature.

Brian


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0010.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/tf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aldo Gangemi [mailto:a.gangemi@istc.cnr.it] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 5:56 PM
> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Cc: swick@w3.org; brian.mcbride@hp.com; jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: Re: [WNET] Draft summary of WNET proposal document
> 
> Please find a formatted version of the draft summary of the 
> WordNet proposal:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jul/0020.html
> 
> It is still to be filled with the many desicions and issues raised in 
> today's telecon. I have eagerly accepted the offering by Brian to act 
> as an editor ;))
> 
> Best
> Aldo
> -- 
> Aldo Gangemi
> Research Scientist
> Laboratory for Applied Ontology
> Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology
> National Research Council (ISTC-CNR)
> Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy
> Tel: +390644161535
> Fax: +3906824737
> a.gangemi@istc.cnr.it
>

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 16:56:52 UTC