Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline

Aldo Gangemi wrote:

> Thanks for pointing at that spontaneous example. The use of Norm is not naïve, 
> it is precise. What is too simplistic is the type mapping encoded in the RDFS 
> file.
> 

I think a big win is to give Norm and others something as easy to use which 
  does represent the current best practice in WordNet mapping, and I think 
that is an achievable goal in the first phase of the WordNet TF

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 05:45:36 UTC