W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:06:11 +0100
Message-ID: <406A6DE3.3050005@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org



A further concern I have is that many Semantic Web users use mainly RDF 
with maybe just a tiny bit of OWL ... To communicate with them OWL Abstract 
Syntax is not appropriate.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 02:08:02 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeremy Carroll: "Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)"
Previous message: Jeremy Carroll: "Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments"
In reply to: Frank van Harmelen: "RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments"
Next in thread: David Norheim: "Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments"
Reply: David Norheim: "Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 31 March 2004 02:08:03 EST