W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: top-3's received so far

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:27:59 +0100
To: "Natasha Noy <noy" <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFED72B913.599C264A-ONC1256E4D.00752EB8-C1256E4D.0075F4B5@agfa.be>


Natasha Noy wrote:
[...]

> 3. Create a catalog of SW tools which not only categorizes them
> according to what they do, but also gives people some sense of how
> good they are, or perhaps who are they good for (e.g., if you are a
> logician and are comfortable with formal concepts, A is a tools for
> you; if you are willing to sacrifice some expressiveness for not
> having to deal with complex formalisms and interfaces, go for B"). It
> may be hard to categorize tools as good or bad, but this more
> usage-oriented categorization may work.

sounds like that that categorization could be an ontology on it's own :)
(or eat your own dogfood...)
that "usage-oriented categorization" is definitely very useful I guess
(and avoids opinions...)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:28:43 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:28:44 EST