Phil I think I can say definitively that there is not an RDF/OWL version publicly available. Also before working on a public version, one needs to sort the copyright issues with WHO who have not in the past encouraged such ventures, but whose attitudes are changing. There are also a host of issues around representing the idiosyncrasies of ICD in any formal way - its dagger/asterisk notation, exclusions, inclusions, residual categories ('not otherwise specified', 'not elsewhere classified', etc.). On top of that there is a whole second volume of rules concerning details of how things are to be classified when several conditions are present, and a long 'index' which in effect provides an extension to the meaning of the classifications. We have always mapped to the required subset rather than attempting to represent it directly in a a logic based formalism. There should be material on the openGalen website on this. If it is not obvious, Jeremy Rogers and/or Pieter Zanstra (see cc above) can point you to the relevant papers and resources. Regards Alan Phil Tetlow wrote: > I am currently working with a UK Government Department who have a need to > utilise The World Health Organisation’s disease classification systems > ICD10, ICD11 and ICDF. Google shows a lot of codification work on this, but > does anyone happen to know if there is an RDF/OWL representation available? > If not, would anyone in the WG be interested in looking at this? > > Kind Regards > > Phil Tetlow > Senior Consultant > IBM Business Consulting Services > Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328 -- Alan L Rector Professor of Medical Informatics Department of Computer Science University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK TEL: +44-161-275-6188/6149/7183 FAX: +44-161-275-6236/6204 Room: 2.88a, Kilburn Building email: rector@cs.man.ac.uk web: www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig www.opengalen.org www.clinical-escience.org www.co-ode.orgReceived on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 10:45:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:14 GMT