* David Wood <dwood@tucanatech.com> [2004-08-30 22:22-0400] > > Hi all, > > Are there any volunteers to review the following DAWG WD? > > RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements > W3C Working Draft 2 August 2004 > > This Version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040802/ > Latest Version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/ I took a look and already sent them a brief comment (suggesting mention of MusicBrainz, who actually do use RDF and share their data, instead of CDDB, who don't) a couple of weeks ago. -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Aug/0000.html I'm going to be on the road for much of the next 2 weeks, so am wary of signing up to do a formal review, but I will try to do another pass through their document. cheers, DanReceived on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 05:56:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:12 GMT