W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > August 2004

RE: An inconsistency in OWL XML Presentation Syntax?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:56:24 -0500
To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Motik@fzi.de, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-webont-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1092898584.24652.81.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 19:16, Uschold, Michael F wrote:
> It seems to me that minimally, there should be a summary of known
> errors/bugs/problems with OWL that is pointed to in a clear obvious
> (i.e. hard to miss) manner in the official OWL document pages. This
> current problem would go on that list.
> If there is no mechanism for this to occur, it seems like an oversight.

We maintain errata for the Recommendations...

but we don't promise to maintain WG Notes. Again, from the status

> "The authors welcome comments on this document, but does not guarantee a
> reply or any further action. [...] no commitment is made by the W3C, or
> any of its members, regarding future updates."
>   -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611/

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 06:56:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:39 UTC