W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > August 2004

Re: [WNET] A term to add to WordNet

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:16:27 +0200
To: danny666@virgilio.it
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200408061416.27590.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>

On fredag 6. august 2004, 13:23, danny666@virgilio.it wrote:
> We were talking at cross purposes a little on #foaf I'm afraid,

OK.

> the 
> WordNet data itself is maintained at Princeton, suggestions to [1].

Right. I knew that, of course, but since the suggestion came up, I 
figured it could be a lot of interaction here, so it would be a good 
place to ask anyway. 

> The swbp group is just looking to express/translate it into RDF.

Yup.

> [1] http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/bugsubmit.pl
>
> PS. note too that "bug" and "bugger" are in very different synsets
> ;-)

uhm, *smacks forehead* :-)

Thanks a lot anyway!

Best,

Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer
kjetil@kjernsmo.net  webmaster@skepsis.no  editor@learn-orienteering.org
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/        OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
Received on Friday, 6 August 2004 08:16:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:39 UTC