- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:44:34 -0000
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Hello Mark, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:mbaker@markbaker.ca] On Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: 25 March 2004 18:43 > To: Williams, Stuart > Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org > Subject: Re: Self-descriptive assertions > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:34:19PM -0000, Williams, Stuart wrote: > > > Extracting the graph isn't the bad part. What's bad is believing > > > that the recipient was trying to communicate the graph. > > ^^^^^^^^sender? > > Doh! Must be the head cold. 8-( > > > What (I think) would be bad would be assuming/believing that the > > sender meant to send with media-type application/rdf+xml. > > True, but why is that bad? Because its not what the sender said. BTW - you introduced the value judgement 'bad' into the discussion. > I believe it's because - as I > said above - that the recipient would believe that the sender > is trying to communicate the graph. I guess that your are free to believe (1st believe above) that... but I don't think it would be a universally shared belief (2nd believe above). > Mark. > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Cheers, Stuart
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 15:45:41 UTC