- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 11:13:10 -0500
- To: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
FYI... The last time we got together synchronously was 31 Oct http://www.w3.org/2003/10/31-sw-meaning-irc After that, we went email-only, with some expectation of resuming after the first of the year. It seems that several of the participants in this forum wrote some relevant stuff as comments on the webarch last call: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 12 February) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0010.html comments on Web Architecture First Edition Pat Hayes 17 Mar 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/1057.html * LC Comments, 3.4 Bijan Parsia * LC Commnets, section 3.0, editorial Bijan Parsia * LC Comments, 2.5 Bijan Parsia * LC Comments, 2.2-2.3 Bijan Parsia * LC Comment, Section 2 (or is it 2.0?) Bijan Parsia -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/ Several of those comments seem pretty relevant to the rdfURIMeaning issue http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#rdfURIMeaning-39 and to the httpRange issue http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#httpRange-14 The TAG was trying to defer those until later... [[ The TAG charter describes a process for issue resolution by the TAG. In accordance with those provisions, the TAG maintains a running issues list. The First Edition of "Architecture of the World Wide Web" does not address every issue that the TAG has accepted since it began work in January 2002. The TAG has selected a subset of issues that the First Edition does address to the satisfaction of the TAG; those issues are identified in the TAG's issues list. The TAG intends to address the remaining (and future) issues after publication of the First Edition as a Recommendation. ]] but those comments seem to argue that's not satisfactory. Hmm. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 12:12:47 UTC