RE: "Publisher" -> "Host" and "Namer" (Bearing on UseImpliesConsent)

Sandro

> Operationally, I might codify this as: one MUST NOT say things using a
> URI term which are known to be logically inconsistent with its first
> use (its introduction); one SHOULD NOT say things which are logically
> inconsistent with how the host uses the term.  (I wonder if saying you
> shouldn't be logically inconsistent with some content is more
> palatable than saying you must assert that content.  I suspect it is
> more palatable, and nearly as useful.)

Makes sense to me, but it figures the Web should always provide access to
the first use context.
Is this the case? Seems to me that very often, one will use second-hand
URIs (at least).

Bernard