W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sw-meaning@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Telecon points

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 04:37:27 -0400
Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
To: Jim Farrugia <james.farrugia@maine.edu>
Message-Id: <543867D2-EE6A-11D7-8C02-0003939E0B44@isr.umd.edu>

On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 01:17  PM, Jim Farrugia wrote:

> I wonder if we could do the following before the Friday telecon,

I'm skeptical.

> using a
> relatively small number of words, say, 500 or fewer?
>
> * Agree, if possible, on Peter's two points below.
>
> * List the issues

This is a sticking point. I think the list is not short, and not clean 
or easy to state. And even if short, then *very* not easy to sort out.

> * State, or have Tim state, "Tim's solution", succinctly.

I would like to get clear on the "use of a URI in RDF implies 
commitment to the ontology". I think that's a fine topic for the first 
telecon and given the electrons spilt already a meaty enough task. (I 
even tried framing an issue on it! :))

I would also be happy discussing Peter's document.

I would like a chair, and have proposed Sandro as chair for the first 
telecon.
[snip]

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 04:37:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37:11 GMT