- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:14:29 -0500
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 10:00, Bijan Parsia wrote: [...] > So, the question arises: What does commitment require of me? It seems > to me that commitment to an ontology, minimally, as a necessary > condition, requires my importing that ontology into my document. What do you mean by "importing" here? > How > could it not? Really? Oh, an my *only* importing/using that ontology. > There may be some fine cases where I can nuance a bit, but it seems > like being committed to someone's ontology requires that I say no less > than what they said, and I only say more in a variety of compatible > wasy. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 11:14:30 UTC