W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sw-meaning@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:05:39 -0500
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Message-Id: <1065809139.13827.1843.camel@dirk.dm93.org>


Why argue against a position that noone has taken?

What is "Strong Ontological Commitment"?

If you want to argue against a position, do it in the
words used to express the position, please.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 14:05:40 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: in defense of standards"
Previous message: pat hayes: "Re: consensus and consistency"
In reply to: Bijan Parsia: "Against Strong Ontological Commitment"
Next in thread: Bijan Parsia: "Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment"
Reply: Bijan Parsia: "Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37:11 GMT