W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sw-meaning@w3.org > October 2003

Re: in defense of standards

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:06:07 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031010095832.024dc5b8@127.0.0.1>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org

At 22:18 09/10/03 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> > If you don't
>> > like it, communicate with your partners. You're free to say, "That way
>> > of saying this irritates me. I'm avoiding that"
>Negotiating with partners doesn't scale.  That's why we have
>standards.

Um, the trouble is, I think, that not negotiating with partners doesn't 
scale either.  Beyond 1.

In this respect, standards can magnify the effects of negotiation -- the 
scope of some consent -- but not create such effects in the first place.  I 
also note that standards themselves are the result of a negotiation.

My point?  I reject the implication that we can disregard negotiation 
because we have standards.

#g
--

[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Fractal.html
(Seems relevant, but I'm not sure exactly how.)


------------
Graham Klyne
GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 05:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:15 GMT