W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sw-meaning@w3.org > November 2003

Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:25:12 -0500
To: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Message-Id: <EBF54A97-0FDE-11D8-B55E-0003939E0B44@isr.umd.edu>

Lynn caught at least one critical typo :)

On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 05:04  PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> 	bought_stock(B, StockOrder) :-
> 		rdf(B, rdf:type, p:Client),
> 		rdf(B, p:made, Order),
> 		rdf(Order, rdf:type, p:BuyOrSellOrder),
> 		rdf(Order, <http://www.example.org/Buy>, StockOrder),
> 		rdf(StockOrder, p:number, Nr),
> 		rdf(StockOrder, p:symbol, Symbol),
> 		buy_stock(B, Symbol, Nr).
> Where buy_stock_for/3


>  actually calls the relevant web service (say) that buys, rather than 
> sells the stock. Interestingly, for this example, we can fairly easily 
> narrow down the interpretation of http://www.example.org/Buy by 
> connecting it (in RDF, OWL, and things like OWL-S) to actual code (or 
> a specific web service with a determined behavior). It's pretty clear 
> (pace the rest of the rats' nest of statements and code one would hope 
> would be present in a realistic example) what 
> http://www.example.org/Buy means *in the above code*, especially when 
> you compare it to the similar predicate:

Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:23:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:01 UTC