Re: Compressed SVG? (and a couple of announcements)

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com> wrote:

> As a concrete proposal, I like to suggest updating the spec to allow SVGZ
> where SVG is currently accepted, with no other changes.  WDYT?
>

That sounds OK I guess.

Rob
-- 
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oioso
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
ooofo
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 21:08:15 UTC