Re: [mpeg-OTspec] OFF with glyphs only in 'SVG ' table?

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com> wrote:

>
> ’OSVG’ can always be proposed (again) at some point in the future,
>

My recommendation is that if people want to do that in the future, do it
under existing tags.  Clients can easily detect that a font has SVG, but no
glyf or CFF, and act accordingly.  New font signatures take much longer to
be deployed, whereas many tools that open fonts are oblivious to the
outline data inside.


> and I have a feeling that that will happen. Note that engines shouldn’t be
> required to support ‘OSVG’ just as they aren’t required to support the SVG
> table, or COLR/CPAL, or  the ‘name’ table (a PDF renderer for example may
> never need to read a ‘name’ table), or the entire TT hinting system. I know
> of CFF-only and TT-only engines as well.
>
>  Sairus
>
>   From: "'Adam Twardoch ' list.adam@twardoch.com [mpeg-OTspec] (List)" <
> mpeg-OTspec-noreply@yahoogroups.com>
> Reply-To: "list.adam@twardoch.com" <list.adam@twardoch.com>
> Date: Friday, November 21, 2014 at 12:20 AM
> To: "mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com" <mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: "public-svgopentype@w3.org" <public-svgopentype@w3.org>
> Subject: [mpeg-OTspec] OFF with glyphs only in 'SVG ' table?
>
>
>
> Simple question: does the OFF spec allow an OFF font where the glyph
> images would only be hosted using the 'SVG ' table, without 'glyf' or 'CFF
> '?
>
> AFAIK, the spec permits to only have 'EBDT'/'EBLC', without any outline
> data, so my guess 'SVG ' only would also be permitted. Correct?
>
> If that is the case, what would be the first four bytes? \00\01\00\00?
> I.e. is my understanding correct that 'OTTO' is only to be used if the 'CFF
> ' table is present, while any other glyph flavors ('glyf', 'SVG ',
> 'EBDT'/'EBLC' and possibly others) mandate \00\01\00\00?
>
> Best,
> Adam
>
>  __._,_.___
>  ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Adam Twardoch (List)" <list.adam@twardoch.com>
> ------------------------------
>    Reply via web post
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpeg-OTspec/conversations/messages/1258;_ylc=X3oDMTJxNzlhaDEwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODYwOTU1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNjAzMDM4OQRtc2dJZAMxMjU4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjU1ODA2MQ--?act=reply&messageNum=1258>
> • Reply to sender
> <list.adam@twardoch.com?subject=Re%3A%20OFF%20with%20glyphs%20only%20in%20%27SVG%20%27%20table%3F>
> • Reply to group
> <mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20OFF%20with%20glyphs%20only%20in%20%27SVG%20%27%20table%3F>
> • Start a New Topic
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpeg-OTspec/conversations/newtopic;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdmd2YmQ1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODYwOTU1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNjAzMDM4OQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzE0MTY1NTgwNjE->
> • Messages in this topic
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpeg-OTspec/conversations/topics/1241;_ylc=X3oDMTM1dWRwdnYxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODYwOTU1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNjAzMDM4OQRtc2dJZAMxMjU4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjU1ODA2MQR0cGNJZAMxMjQx>
> (6)
> Visit Your Group
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpeg-OTspec/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmb3BtcDNsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODYwOTU1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNjAzMDM4OQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTY1NTgwNjE->
>
>
>  [image: Yahoo! Groups]
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDAybjc0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODYwOTU1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNjAzMDM4OQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjU1ODA2MQ-->
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
> Unsubscribe <mpeg-OTspec-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> • Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>
>   .
>
>  __,_._,___
>

Received on Saturday, 22 November 2014 00:06:51 UTC