Re: meeting at TPAC, agenda planning

Hi Chris,

I didn't put my name as an attendee of the SVG WG sessions in the survey,
so can you add me to your list for Thursday (and Friday if it happens)
please. My only conflict at the moment is a meeting with ARIA at 4pm on
Friday, so that shouldn't be a problem if your plan to only meet on
Thursday goes ahead.

As the potential AAM editor, I'd definitely want to attend any conversation
about or related to that, but I'd like to attend for the entire day as I've
not been directly involved in SVG WG activities before.

Thanks,

Ian.

On 1 November 2017 at 17:14, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 31-Oct-17 15:36, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>
> We have the Thursday and Friday set aside for us to meet; a few people
> signed up, but probably not enough for a two-day meeting.
>
> Unless I hear otherwise by the end of today, I'll ask W3C admin to mark
> our meeting as Thursday only. That way we can all be around on the same
> day...
>
> That works for me, though I have a conflict Thursday afternoon.
>
> I can try to put together an agenda with Bogdan.
>
> Technical items I'm aware of:
> * AAM editor (we have a volunteer, thank you Ian!) and outlining what's
> to be done
> * addressing existing issues
>
> In particular, identifying the highest priority ones and also deciding
> whether any existing issues should be deferred to a later version.
>
> * test planning
> * spec pruning, identify unimplemented items to drop from 2.0
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> --
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director @ W3C
> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 13:05:58 UTC